ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION IN CHINA
is not really different from that in the rest of the world, except that
environmental authorities are relatively new and less established. In order
to understand why corporate environmental performance has hardly improved
despite the existing regulatory framework, empirical research on high-level
executives’ perceptions of environmental protection is essential.
This unique book analyses and interprets Chinese managers’ perceptions of
environmental management and regulatory enforcement practices in Chinese
enterprises. Most importantly, it identifies the bottlenecks to
environmental protection in Chinese firms. It includes a detailed analysis
of the needs for management training (for example, CEO and executive
development and MBA education) in China and presents a roadmap of how they
can be met. Finally, it presents two case studies that illustrate how
Chinese corporations currently react to a wide range of different
environmental challenges, including hardening regulatory pressure,
competition and lack of capital.
Based on an innovative research project sponsored by the UNESCO/UNDP offices
in Beijing and undertaken by the Institute for Management Development (IMD),
Lausanne, Switzerland and the Business School of the Academy of Science and
Technology (USTC), Hefei, China,
Greening
Chinese Business
provides the first hard empirical evidence of how Chinese managers view
environmental protection. Over 300 companies—both state-owned enterprises
and SMEs—took part in the research.
Key findings include
- Around 70%
of managers surveyed admit moderate or even heavy environmental impact (this
is a subjective assessment without an external benchmark). Furthermore,
they indicate that the lack of environmental performance is primarily due
to insufficient managerial expertise, capital and employment-related
protectionism.
- Managers
hesitate to take necessary action to upgrade technical equipment, because,
although decreasing pollution, upgrading would lead to lay-offs that, in
turn, would diminish social stability. Since the latter is first priority
in China, managers fear loss of their companies’—and, attached to that,
their personal—image, which plays a very important role in Chinese
culture.
- Regulative
enforcement has been strong enough to put environmental management on the
‘to do’ lists of Chinese managers. Nevertheless, managers criticise
existing enforcement practices as being too lax and untransparent (due to
local protectionism, bribery and lack of expertise in the enforcement
institutions).
- Managers
consider environmental functionaries—the Chinese equivalent of an
environmental protection agency—and the government to be the most
important environmental stakeholders. This is a clear sign for their
predominantly reactive attitude towards environmental protection: few
Chinese companies are going beyond compliance and pioneering integrated
approaches to pollution prevention. The research shows similarities
between current Chinese company approaches and the ‘state of the art’ in
industrial centres of OECD countries such as Germany in the 1960s.
Apart from a lack of capital, managers cite a lack of expertise—managerial
more than technical—as the main obstacle to ‘greening’ their organisations.
Environmental management programmes need to be developed:
competence-building should start with CEOs and executives.
Greening Chinese Business
will aid readers to understand how: Chinese managers perceive and react to
the increasing (more external than internal) pressure to improve
environmental protection; understand the regulatory, public and business
environment in which Chinese managers make decisions about environmental
protection; understand the potential for improvement of this regulatory,
public and business environment, either as a manager or an external
stakeholder and develop strategies that lead to improved stakeholder
relationships and, consequently, to competitive advantage; understand the
urgent need to develop environmental management practices in Chinese
companies in areas such as EMSs and supply chain management; and identify
the resources available for management development in China.
Back to the Top
Reviews
With China’s recent entry into the WTO and its rapidly growing economy,
Greening Chinese Business
is a timely look at corporate sustainability in the country - with a focus
on environmental management rather than labour or human rights issues. It
is based on comprehensive research which explored the views of around 300
of China’s top managers. For those not academically inclined the book can
be rather hard going - but the executive summary provides a good overview.
Sustainability Radar, December 2003
Joining
the scant ranks of books devoted to China’s approaches to sustainable
development comes a valuable new work by an international collaborative of
researchers.
The first detailed investigation of current attitudes and approaches to,
and knowledge of, environmental management in China,
Greening Chinese Business
sets out the research process, findings and conclusions of a project which
brought together the UNDP, the School of the Academy of Science and
Technology (USTC) in Hefei, China and the Institute for Management
Development (IMD) in Lausanne.
Of course, on first reading there is plenty to confirm current external
perceptions: managers in Chinese businesses acknowledge they have a
considerable negative environmental impact but feel their hands are
largely tied.
Environmentally-focused process improvements compete for scarce investment,
and there is an absence of the environmental management expertise
necessary to integrate such priorities into company processes, which leads
to an emissions-focused, ‘end of pipe’ solution bias. The case for
environmental management training is made loud and clear.
The research produces some interesting vignettes of the complexity to be
faced. Many managers cite the fact that better, environmentally-friendly
technology will result in large-scale employee redundancy in their
factories as a reason forcing them to hold back on environmental
improvements.
Before the bickering between the Triple Bottom Liners and the Double
Bottom Liners gets out of hand, however, it is worth observing that
managers (different ones, perhaps) also identify employee health as a key
criterion driving their adoption of higher environmental standards.
Inevitably, the first wave of stakeholder engagement will take place
through regulators and this has managed to place environmental management
on the management to-do list, but enforcement remains patchy.
An interesting clue to where the greatest driver for change might emerge,
however, was the finding that managers in smaller companies in which
executives are personally involved in reviewing environmental impacts tend
less frequently to cite economic reasons as obstacles to the adoption of
higher standards. Perhaps facilitating such empathy will prove more
productive than urging China to join those drowning in the whirlpool
circularity of the business case argument.
Andrew Newton, Ethical Corporation
Back to the Top
Contents
List of
figures and tables
Acknowledgements
Foreword
Axel Hebel, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural
Organisation (UNESCO) Office, Beijing
1.
Executive summary (78K)
1.1
Research objectives and methodology
1.2 Findings from the questionnaire
1.3 Findings from the interviews
1.4 A managerial view of the environmental ‘to do’ list
1.5 Recommendations for the development of training materials and training
programmes on environmental management
1.6 Two case studies
2. Survey
research: managers’ views on environmental legislation
and management
2.1
Research objectives
2.2 Research design: methodology and database
2.3 Findings from the questionnaire
2.4 Data analysis
2.5 Data interpretation
2.6 Findings from the interviews
2.7 Conclusion
3.
Recommendations for the development of training materials and programmes on
environmental management
3.1
Training capacity
3.2 Demand
3.3 Key areas of learning
3.4 Training institutions
3.5 Curriculum and case study development
3.6 Additional needs
4. Two
case studies
4.1
Automobile company: ‘environmental protection is a responsibility’
4.2 Fertiliser company: ‘no alternative but to proceed’
Appendix 1:
The seven hypotheses
Appendix 2: Distribution of the questionnaire sample
Appendix 3: Distribution of the interview sample
Appendix 4: Questionnaire
Appendix 5: Statistical model used
Appendix 6: Response variables and factor clusters used for data analysis
Appendix 7: Interview questions and guidelines
Appendix 8: Recategorised data
Appendix 9: Data analysis: models and tables
Appendix 10: Interview analysis
Glossary
List of abbreviations
About the authors
Ulrich Steger is Alcan Professor of
Environmental Management at the International Institute for Management
Development (IMD), Switzerland, and Director of IMD’s Forum for Corporate
Sustainability Management and Corporate Governance Research Initiative. He
directs major partnership programmes with DaimlerChrysler and Allianz. He
holds an Honorary Professorship for International Management at the
Technical University Berlin and was formerly a professor at The European
Business School (Germany), a Harvard University Fellow (USA) and guest
professor at St Gallen University (Switzerland). Elected to the German
Bundestag (1976–84), he was Minister of Economics and Technology for Hesse.
As a board member of Volkswagen, he was in charge of environment and
traffic matters and the implementation of a worldwide environmental
strategy. He has published extensively, most recently Corporate
Diplomacy: Strategies for a Volatile World (John Wiley, 2002).
Fang Zhaoben is Dean of the
Business School and Professor of Finance and Statistics at the University
of Science and Technology of China and former Dean of the Mathematics
Department. He has led and chaired many research projects funded by
international organisations and the China National Science Foundation. He
is a member of the American Statistics Association and Institute of
Mathematical Statistics. He is the author of more than ten books and many
papers published in China and abroad.
Lu Wei is Associate Professor
at the University of Science and Technology of China Business School. He
is active in management consulting and corporate training and has been
involved in many international projects including the ‘Renewable Energy
Business Development Training in China’ programme, sponsored by the W.
Alton Jones Foundation and the World Wide Fund for Nature. He was formerly
a management consultant at Anhui Management Development Centre, which was
sponsored by the Canadian International Development Agency. Lu Wei has
written and translated extensively, and has recently translated Ulrich
Steger’s The Strategic Dimension of Environmental Management (USTC
Press, 2002).
|